TPO 47: integrated writing
The article provides three reasons against powered flight of Pterosaurs which were an ancient group of winged reptiles. However, the professor explains that new investigations show the capability of powered flight of Pterosaurs and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that Pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded and because of that they were unable to produce required energy to fly. Conversely, the professor refutes this point by stating that new researches indicated that they were warm blood and had high body temperature which indicates they were able to generate energy needed to fly.
Furthermore, the article claims that Pterosaurs were too heavy that they would not have been able to fly. On the contrary, the professor contends that although they were large, their weight was comfortable for flying. She explains that the bones of these reptiles was hollow which leads to low weight of them.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that their back legs were not powerful enough to run fast of jump high to launch into air. However, the professor casts doubt over this view and contends that Pterosaurs even though their hind legs were weak, they were using all four legs to jump and run. So, they had enough power ti launch themselves into air.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d refutes each of the authors reasons. First, the reading states that Pterosaur...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to generate energy needed to fly. Furthermore, the article claims that Pte...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...low which leads to low weight of them. Finally, the reading passage holds the v...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12322274882 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41093918395 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2535348727 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486291534853 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196359928197 0.0996497079465 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778667253523 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277536944338 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340444706267 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.