The reading passage proposes three arguments regarding pterosaurs' disability of powered flight. However, the lecture mentions three pieces of evidence that might cast doubt on the claim.
First off, in contrast to what the reading suggests, that pterosaurs are cold-blooded animals that cannot generate sufficient energy for powered flight, the lecture points out evidence of fur-like structures, indicating that pterosaurs might actually be warm-blooded creatures. Accordingly, metabolism was accelerated and adequate energy for powered flight was produced.
Second, opposite to the reading’s argument that the weight of pterosaurs might prevent them from flapping their wings fast enough, the lecture argued that although pterosaurs were considerably large just like the giraffe, the anatomical structure of pterosaurs, for example, their hollow bones, provided them with lightweight compared with their size. Hence, she believes the light weight would probably allow pterosaurs to flap like birds.
As for the reason that muscles of pterosaurs were too small and weak to provide them with enough height and velocity to take off, the professor protests it as follows. Contrast to birds which has just two limps, pterosaurs were helped by two more limps to push themselves. This way, enough power could have been generated for them to take off the ground without any trouble, which also exists in other animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...ith their size. Hence, she believes the light weight would probably allow pterosaurs to flap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, first, hence, however, regarding, second, so, as for, for example, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66822429907 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67805935736 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64953271028 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.0577079266 49.2860985944 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.777777778 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.06452816374 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406713079366 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147078068911 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701127777895 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215016652205 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699765460181 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.