In the lecture, the professor points out to the new research that showed all the arguments presented in the reading passage against the powered flight of pterosaurs is wrong and they may be capable of powered flight.
First of all, the professor states due to the hair and fir in their body they can be warm in the cold area and the idea of the author about their cold blooded metabolism could be wrong. So based of the professor, they could keep themselves warm and faster if they would have to.
Secondly, the professor says in contrast to the reading these animals were not heavy. In fact, their hollow bone helped them to be light for their body and keep them airborne by flying.
Lastly, the speaker challenges the idea of having big hind leg for ptersaurs to take off like other birds. She states birds have powerful hind limbs due to their way of walking on the ground by using two limbs to push off but the ptersaurs walked on the ground on their four limbs. So they could push off the ground by their four limbs and fast enough to do take off or jump.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 12.0772626932 8% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44162436548 5.08290768461 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.08444716718 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553299492386 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 419.366225166 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3729004712 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311802965338 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126264626817 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337293862979 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168959658753 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273572412585 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 53.8541721854 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 63.6247240618 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.