The article states that whether petrosaurs were able to powered flight or to glide and provide three reasons against pterosaurs ability to powered flight. However, the professor explains that they might be able to powered flight and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the metabolism of pterosaurs was very low because their blood was cold and produced insufficient amount of energy required for powered flight. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the fossils of pterosaurs that have been explored revealed that ptersaurs were had a dense hair covering their skin and made their blood warm enough to increase their metabolism rate and produce much energy required to powered flight.
Second, the passage posits that pterosaurs were too heavy and did not able to flap their wings fast to stay flight for any length of time, but the professor opposes this point by explaining that it was discovered that pterosaurs had hallow bones delighted their weight.
Third, the article claims that all the animals with powered flight like birds are capable of taking off from the ground because of their big and powerful back legs muscle and argued that the back legs muscles of petrosaurs were too small and weak to permit them to run fast or jump to launch themselves into the air, but the professor refutes this point by saying that pterosaurs used all the four limps legs to run and jump
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their big and powerful back legs muscle and argued that the back legs muscles of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99585062241 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26287591961 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526970954357 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 21.2450331126 188% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.399340143 49.2860985944 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.666666667 110.228320801 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.1666666667 21.698381199 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517244602169 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.256038348708 0.0996497079465 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750444998465 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310301154461 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033487504082 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.3589403974 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 53.8541721854 73% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.0289183223 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.61 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.498013245 171% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.