The article states that a humpback whales are the answer for the puzzling question of how animals control to migrate for extremely large distance. The reading passage gives three reasons of support by argued the theory of humpback whales navigate the stars, but the professor refutes each of these points.
First, the reading states that the humpback whales are seems to be very smart to navigate the stars as their brains are too complex and the article supposed that brain complexity is the mean of intelligence. But the professor refutes this point by saying that there is not any evidence for connect between stars navigate and intelligence and he gives an example of birds like ducks as, they also used to navigate stars but they are not seem to be very smart. In order to that, intelligence is not an evidence of star navigation.
Second, the reading passage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that they follow the stars as the signs for their way and they do not like terrestrial animals of birds that have landmarks to follow. However the professor opposes that point by explained that the reason for make them directed in straight lines is the bi-magnification center in their brains that allowed them to oriented themselves and moved in straight way by the sense and attraction towards magnification field.
Third, the reading passage posses that humpback whales exhibit a strange behavior as they are often observed floating straight up for minutes. Although the professor explained that spy-hopping is rare for instance sharks do not migrate or look to stars while they spy, but they just look for the animals that they want to hunt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...used to navigate stars but they are not seem to be very smart. In order to that, int...
^^^^
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
...assage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...of birds that have landmarks to follow. However the professor opposes that point by exp...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... way by the sense and attraction towards magnification field. Third, the readi...
^^
Line 8, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pping is rare for instance sharks do not migrate or look to stars while they spy,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96830985915 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50431832952 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482394366197 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.611687203 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.777777778 110.228320801 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441975746021 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188646630117 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075225403722 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275473435792 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471750570097 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.3589403974 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.