There is no doubts that the best way for solving the issue is by making correction. In according to that I prefer to discuss the mistake after the ending of the class or meeting. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each sides. The explanations go as follows.
First, If you care about the respect, you should not cutting the person. For example, last year I have attended a biology lecture and the professor was discussing the difference between exothermic and endothermic. Unfortunately, he defined the exothermic process as the animal is able to gain his temperature from internal organs. Also, he defined the endothermic process as the animal is able to gain his temperature from outside. After the lecture was finished. I have gone to the professor's office and told him that he was reversed the two definitions and he thanked me a lot and promised to correct his mistake at the next lecture.
Second, The leaders or the old people hate to be interrupted by the young or by the employer. For example, when my friend Asmaa was making an interview with the meeting leader of a big company. Asmaa was noticed that the meeting leader was mistaken when he was discussing the responsibilities of her new position. In order to that, Asmaa interrupted his talk and said ( Excuse me, I think you are mistaken a bout my duties). She told me that the leader was feeling very annoying from she and refused to complete the meeting.
Third, Interrupting the professors in public is unethical behavior. For instance, at my last lecture, the professor was made a big mistake in solve a mathematical equation. Owing to that my friend Ahmed interrupted the professor in front of all the students and he said ( hey professor, I think you have make a trouble mistake). I remember that the professor's face turned to the red color and he was very angry and screamed to Ahmed to going outside. Finally, at the end of exams, Ahmed was very disappointed when he failed at the professor's subject.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, all the ground should bear in mind that the respect of responsible people and old people is very necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are no doubts'?
Suggestion: There are no doubts
There is no doubts that the best way for solving the issue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'cut'
Suggestion: cut
... care about the respect, you should not cutting the person. For example, last year I ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to gain his temperature from outside. After the lecture was finished. I have gone t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ecture was finished. I have gone to the professors office and told him that he was reverse...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat, Asmaa interrupted his talk and said Excuse me, I think you are mistaken a bo...
^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in front of all the students and he said hey professor, I think you have make a t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, third, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78108108108 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81481134228 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494594594595 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8925139298 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2380952381 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845797423573 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281415290264 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264493707491 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0451414503654 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318786770008 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.