The article states that a humpback whales are the answer for the puzzling question of how animals control to migrate for extremely large distance. The reading passage gives three reasons of support by argued the theory of humpback whales navigate the stars, but the professor refutes each of these points.
First, the reading states that the humpback whales are seemed to be very smart to navigate the stars as their brains are too complex and the article supposed that brain complexity is the mean of intelligence. But the professor refutes this point by saying that there is not any evidence for connecting between stars navigate and intelligence and he gives an example of birds like ducks as, they also used to navigate stars but they are not seemed to be very smart. In order to that, intelligence is not an evidence of star navigation.
Second, the reading passage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that they follow the stars as the signs for their way and they do not like terrestrial animals or birds that have landmarks to follow. However, the professor opposes that point by explained that the reason for make them directed in straight lines is the bi-magnification center in their brains that allowed them to oriented themselves and moved in straight way by the sense and attraction towards magnification field.
Third, the reading passage posses that humpback whales exhibit a strange behavior as they are often observed floating straight up for minutes. Although the professor explained that spy-hopping is rare for instance sharks never migrate or look to stars while they are make spy, but they just look for the animals that they want to hunt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
...assage claimed that humpback are always migrate in straight lines and it argued that th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51403937268 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480701754386 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2612972544 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 21.698381199 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445969668405 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189548737607 0.0996497079465 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074843169789 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277092202775 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470515071501 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.