The article states that three reasons against the ability of petrosaurs to powered flight. However, the professor explains that they might be able to powered flight and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading says that the metabolism of pterosaurs was very low because their blood was cold and produced insufficient amount of energy required for powered flight. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that the fossils of pterosaurs that have been explored revealed that ptersaurs were had a dense hair covering their skin and made their blood warm enough to increase their metabolism rate and produce much energy required to powered flight.
In addition to that, the passage posits that pterosaurs were too heavy and did not able to flap their wings fast to stay flight for any time, but the professor opposes this point by explaining that the fossils of pterosaurs showed that they had hallow bones made their weight light in compared to their size.
Finaaly, the article claims that all the animals with powered flight like birds are capable of taking off from the ground because of their big and powerful back legs muscle and argued that the back legs muscles of petrosaurs were too small and weak to permit them to run fast or jump to release themselves into the air, but the professor refutes this point by saying that pterosaurs used all the four limps to run and jump and do not like the birds that use only two limps.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their wings fast to stay flight for any time, but the professor opposes this poi...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their big and powerful back legs muscle and argued that the back legs muscles of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20378220339 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 21.2450331126 193% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.439608879 49.2860985944 269% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.5 110.228320801 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6666666667 21.698381199 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469504395224 0.272083759551 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217144075592 0.0996497079465 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854120796408 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265891873875 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717367251954 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.3589403974 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.0289183223 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.498013245 175% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.