The article and the lecture both about the frog species and its declining consequences day by day. The reading passage believes that the frog species is becoming decrease now-a-days and it has a negative influence on the society as this population in turn, save the people. While the lecturer made claims on the article. She mentioned that it seems not exactly and directly proportional to this effect, there are many problem by these theories.
First of all, the author points out that chemicals pesticide, which is used to destroy the insects species also, killing the frog population. So the farmers should eliminate the chemical by the adjacent area for frogs. This point is challenged by the professor. She states that this chemical is not directly cause effect to the them, in spite of, they kill bacteria and save the crops by inhibit the little organism and economical supports the farmer as well.
Secondly, the reading passage contends that, a fungus (disease destroying the frog community) is a huge problem and also infected the frog generation. This statement is rebuts by the lecturer. She says that if mainly the fungus is affecting the frog and treatment is not carrying the overall population, thus it does not meant that it treating all the future generation as well because it transmit genetically to the eggs.
Last, the article establishes that, due to human wasting effort, like: wastage of too much water, this cause frogs losing their natural habitat and there is declining occur. The professor, on the other hand, posits that this is not the major factor, in fact, the global damaging initiates the problem, not by the human using water, because it is also very beneficial for the human population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...lecture both about the frog species and its declining consequences day by day. The ...
^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is population in turn, save the people. While the lecturer made claims on the article...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...ortional to this effect, there are many problem by these theories. First of all, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chemicals'' or 'chemical's'?
Suggestion: chemicals'; chemical's
...irst of all, the author points out that chemicals pesticide, which is used to destroy the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'insects'' or 'insect's'?
Suggestion: insects'; insect's
...pesticide, which is used to destroy the insects species also, killing the frog populati...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...hemical is not directly cause effect to the them, in spite of, they kill bacteria and sa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...he overall population, thus it does not meant that it treating all the future generat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transmits'?
Suggestion: transmits
...he future generation as well because it transmit genetically to the eggs. Last, the a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in fact, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01041666667 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53497668053 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8232581746 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302641345994 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935037482352 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073928739321 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178742376381 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310052133389 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.