A problem has been risen in recent years- the delicing population of frogs. The reading passage provides three possible solutions to recover the population, while the lecturer points out the disadvantages of these ideas.
First, the article suggests to prohibit the farmers from using harmful pesticides due to fact that the declining frog population is caused by pesticides. Though inhibiting using pesticides can prevent the frogs' nervous system to be harmed by pesticides, the lecturer thinks it is not practicle to execute this policy. The reason is the economical lose from the farmers whose farms are close to the habitats of frogs. The lower yield caused by not using pesticides make the farmers unable to compete with their competitors.
Second, the reading passage pointed out that the fungus may paly a role to harm the population of frogs. Fungus will thicken the skin of frogs and cause them die of dehydration. Therefore, the passage suggests to carry ou the antifungal medication. However, the lectuer disagrees with the idea. In her opinion, it is a complicated way to prevent all the forgs from infected by the fungus. The reason is that they have to treat the frogs individually, and all the offsprings will need to be treated again. The solution cannot be executed forever since the expensive cost.
Third, the article provides a solution due to the fact that the forgs' habitats were harmed by humanbeings. It suggests to protect the area of water and the wetland habitats since the forgs need to lay their eggs in water. Although the solution seems good, the lecturer pointed out that the reason of the habitats got harmed is global warming. Therfore, protecting the water area may not contribute to maintain the population of frogs.
As a result, the lecturer disagrees with the three solutions provided in the reading passage. The solutions are not practical to the lecturer, and the better solution to maintain the population of frogs need to be study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests prohibiting'.
Suggestion: suggests prohibiting
... of these ideas. First, the article suggests to prohibit the farmers from using harmful pesticid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests carrying'.
Suggestion: suggests carrying
... of dehydration. Therefore, the passage suggests to carry ou the antifungal medication. However, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests protecting'.
Suggestion: suggests protecting
...habitats were harmed by humanbeings. It suggests to protect the area of water and the wetland habit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06402439024 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66239196562 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47256097561 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8131763615 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4210526316 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355160004655 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104249067377 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882759525847 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177002887842 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107020952924 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.