In the reading passage, the author mentions three methods to sort out the problem of decreasing frog populations. These solutions, however, are refuted by the lecturer.
First, the author suggests that forbidding farmers from using detrimental pesticides, which affect frog's nervous system, could reduce the harm substantially. The lecturer disagrees with this suggestion and thinking over it from economical perspective. She argues that it would be rather unfair to those prohibited farmers, who will lose many crops.
Second, the author claims that a wide-spread fungus is responsible for killing frogs. Thus, a large scale of medical treatment is indispensable to protect frogs from infection. The lecturer counters this assumption, pointing out the drawback of this method. Since the treatment can only apply individually and can't be transferred to the offspring, the process of implementing treatments would be significantly costly.
Last but not least, the author contends that human activities such as overusing water resources also destroyed frog's habitats, threatening their propagation. The lecturer rebuts this view, asserting that global warming would be the main cause of changing the habitats. Therefore, preserving the water habitats will not probably enough to reverse the situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...eatment can only apply individually and cant be transferred to the offspring, the pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.828125 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95759508834 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.708333333333 0.540411800872 131% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4460021506 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31730398736 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977074105211 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798210675126 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17001944843 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342899014108 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.42419426049 126% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.