The reading passage and the lecture talk about the migration of the long distance of humpback whale. The author proposes three possible solutions that suggest the reason behind the long distance migration but the lecturer cast doubt on the reading passage. The professor claims that all three solutions that are expressed in the reading passage are not so convincing.
First, according to reading the humpback whale are intelligent enough to navigate the long distance by using stars. On the other hand, the professor claims that there are no connection between intelligent and the ability to navigate long straight distance. He provides an example that is duck, although its intellectual power is average it can navigate the long straight distance by using stars.
Second, the passage mentions that some external object (stars) can determine the direction of humpback like other birds or terrestrial animal. The lecturer finds another solution, he says the external object may be the earth magnetic field that can be used for the movement of humpback.
Third, the passage indicates an unusual behavior of humpback that is spy-hooping. But the lecturer clearly mention that spy-hooping is rare but other animal like shark also shows this type of character for hunting not for navigation a long distance. Because stars are unavailable at day time but this character is seen at day time by shark
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...urer cast doubt on the reading passage. The professor claims that all three solutio...
^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'ducked'.
Suggestion: ducked
...istance. He provides an example that is duck, although its intellectual power is ave...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23555555556 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58563553331 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.608579987 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373410295226 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143323972573 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798511383814 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209352160716 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543330604475 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.