Reading and lecture discusses about ability of hump back whales to with stars for food and for finding mate to far distance. Reading suggests that humpback whales possess distinct trait of migrating through stars, while lecture thinks that reasons explained in reading arenot logical.
First, reading argues that these whales have higher cognitive and sensory level to use
stars to direct themselves due to highly complex brain function. In contrast, professor
thinks that there is no connection between intelligence and ability to use stars
for direction. He further explains this by providing example of duck, he says that
duck naturally accquired that feature of using star for direction. However,
ducks are not as intelligent as the the whales.
Second, reading claims that humpback whales travel in straight lines, that can happen only
by using external objects as mark. However, lecture refutes this statment in of the article.
Hesays that, migration in straight lines occurs due to capability of these whales to orient
themselves to earth's magnetic field. Furthermore, he adds that brain of this whale has
chemical called magnetide which is sensntive to earth's magnetic field.
Finally, reading states that these whales float up and down in the ocean to see the stars to guide
for travelling. In contrary, lecture states that this spy hoping is rare among animals but
common among shark in search of prey. Furthermore, he says that whale perform this
activity at day time, where there are no stars. As as result, professor sucesfully refutes the points
made in lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igher cognitive and sensory level to use stars to direct themselves due to highl...
^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evel to use stars to direct themselves due to highly complex brain function. In...
^^
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... providing example of duck, he says that duck naturally accquired that feature of...
^^^
Line 8, column 33, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...wever, ducks are not as intelligent as the the whales. Second, reading claims that...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 33, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...wever, ducks are not as intelligent as the the whales. Second, reading claims that...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in straight lines, that can happen only by using external objects as mark. Howev...
^^^
Line 12, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to capability of these whales to orient themselves to earths magnetic field. Fur...
^^^
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, he adds that brain of this whale has chemical called magnetide which is sensn...
^^^
Line 16, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in the ocean to see the stars to guide for travelling. In contrary, lecture sta...
^^^
Line 17, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his spy hoping is rare among animals but common among shark in search of prey. Fu...
^^^
Line 19, column 50, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: As
... at day time, where there are no stars. As as result, professor sucesfully refutes th...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor sucesfully refutes the points made in lecture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34645669291 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46244027892 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582677165354 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9215597463 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.09492273731 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343612385961 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113396034493 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605827413485 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104345312026 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496098051412 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.