TPO integrated essay
Reading and lecture discusses about advantages and disadvantages to audience when university professor participate in television programs. Reading states that professors can be very famous if they role TV program. While, lecturer thinks TV programs can jeopardize professors' status.
First, reading mention that TV program can provide academic knowledge to large number of spectators. He mention that
it can offer stupendous outcomes to general public. This statement is rebutted by lecturer. Lecturer states that professor may tend to entertain people, because not everyone have profound academic knowledge. Furthermore, she points out that professor may not have enough money for research and present something interesting.
Secondly, reading suggest that it can provide benefits to university if professor involve in TV programs; such as it can enhance university's demand and can attract more new students and can aid in earning exorbitant money. On the contrary, lecture cast doubt on this type or marketing. She points out that professors will certainly waste time, for travelling to distant places, preparing, getting dressed. She suggests that professors can be productive in teaching students and to attain university business meeting.
Finally, reading states that TV is basic mode of communication between thousand of people and professor,
they can get opportunity to learn to observers who do not have chance to interact directly by any other means.
However, lecture did not agree with this way of learning. She claims that professors are erudite,
if they are providing intellectual academic lecture viewers are not going to pay much attention. Rather, they may end up
presenting superficial subjects about history and current events happening around the earth to entertain viewers. As a result, lecture successfully cast doubt against points made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...be very famous if they role TV program. While, lecturer thinks TV programs can jeopar...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...ledge to large number of spectators. He mention that it can offer stupendous outcome...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge number of spectators. He mention that it can offer stupendous outcomes to gene...
^^^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... it can offer stupendous outcomes to general public. This statement is rebutted by lecturer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 72, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
... is basic mode of communication between thousand of people and professor, they can get...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween thousand of people and professor, they can get opportunity to learn to obs...
^^^
Line 10, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... She claims that professors are erudite, if they are providing intellectual acade...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67844522968 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87420590272 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0293339557 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.09492273731 220% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.