Integrated essay
Reading and lecture discusses whether events and stories depicted
in the memoir created by were true ot not. Reading states that Chevalier may have
added interesting stories in his memoir to allure people. While, lecture
argues that his memoir was guenuine and based on true stories.
First, reading states that Chevalier was addicted to game and parties and
also borrowed money from other swiss merchant. Reading points out that if he
was affluent there was no need for him to acquire money. Lecture casts doubt on
this statement made in reading. He argues that Chevalier owned numerous
properties and was wealthy. Furthermore, she points out that he sold some of his
properties and it took time to get his money.
Second, reading mentions that there was no way that Chevalier could have remembered
each and every word from famous writer Voltaire. So, he claims that information
written in memoir was controversial. In contrary, lecture refutes that by saying that
Chevalier had a habit of writing all information in his journal. As a result, lecture
rebutes that information presented in memoir was original.
Third, reading claims that Chevalier must have offered bribe to other prisoners
to escape from jail. In addition, he states that It was evidenced by the hole in the ceiling created
by metal rod. On the other hand, lecture states that he escaped via ceiling as
he mentioned, but there was no evidence that he bribed other prisoners.
Furthermore, she points that other inmates were stronger than Chevalier and
still they did not bribe. As a consequence, lecture successfully casts doubt
on points made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sses whether events and stories depicted in the memoir created by were true ot no...
^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... merchant. Reading points out that if he was affluent there was no need for him t...
^^^
Line 10, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... she points out that he sold some of his properties and it took time to get his m...
^^^
Line 15, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary, lecture refutes that by saying that Chevalier had a habit of writing all inf...
^^^
Line 16, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion in his journal. As a result, lecture rebutes that information presented in me...
^^^
Line 21, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re states that he escaped via ceiling as he mentioned, but there was no evidence ...
^^^
Line 23, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inmates were stronger than Chevalier and still they did not bribe. As a consequen...
^^^
Line 24, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quence, lecture successfully casts doubt on points made in reading.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, third, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23507462687 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56728078093 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514925373134 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4400778391 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5294117647 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.09492273731 537% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.