Reading and lecture discusses about the animals from olden times. Reading states that animals were larger than today. While, lecture thinks that someone should not come to conclusion without proper evidences. He put forth reasons for holding his opinion.
First, reading suggests that gigantic animals were results from the abundant supply of oxygen in earth’s ancient atmosphere. Lecture challenges this point made in reading. Professor points out that there was no adequate oxygen available due to frequent volcanic activity. In addition, survival of animals was critical due to presence of harmful gases.
Second, reading implies that large number of animals must have nourished animals as a result they grew in size. In addition, reading states that large body trait must have been passed to the offspring. In contrast, author says that early plants were malnourished to support other sustenance of other animals. Furthermore, she points out that plants depended on contaminated gases evidenced from the study of fossil.
Third, reading put forth that researchers thought that warm climate might be factor in exponential growth of animals as surplus energy can be transmitted to the channels for later use. Lecture casts doubt on this statement. He thinks that animal body required to cool off after exposing to heat, so they would not have chance to grow bigger without this process. As a result, lecture successfully argued the points made in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es that animals were larger than today. While, lecture thinks that someone should not...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40869565217 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52308809497 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621739130435 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.005756143 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.375 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30497118144 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902448561483 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713798741454 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17759533032 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219376814469 0.0443174109184 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.