In view of the reading, the author enumerates the possibility of humpback whale's migration for long distances by using the star's navigation by pointing out 3 reasons for support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents a piece of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that so genius are the hampback whales that could consider the ability of them to use star as a navigation tool. Not only are they so intelligence to do such this work but also they have such well-developed brain and abstract system of sensory which help them to have orientation in the night sky. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is no relation between intelligency and use the stars. The docks also have this feature and are not intelligent. This is just a feature they were born with it.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the humpback whale can migrate in straight lines by using some external object like stars. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that there is a biomagnetic sensor in their brain and they use the magnetism feature of the earth. So, there is no connection between the ability of preserve movement in a straight and use the stars.
Finally, the author asserts spy-hopping behavior as an extraordinary behavior which the whales straight up their head above the water and look up as the last point for supporting the humpback navigation by using stars. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by saying that this behavior is weird but there is an animal called Shaves, do this strange work without any migration. They do it to look the other animals they want to hunt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stars'' or 'star's'?
Suggestion: stars'; star's
...gration for long distances by using the stars navigation by pointing out 3 reasons fo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'shave'?
Suggestion: Shave
... is weird but there is an animal called Shaves, do this strange work without any migra...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, look, so, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82372881356 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60124823638 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515254237288 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9202848252 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.461538462 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452619685776 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142437316733 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964300952787 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259961426386 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295689816717 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.