Knowing how to act with false statement has always been a noteworthy matter when it comes to participate in class or meeting. That is owing to the fact that there are some mistake that sometimes occured by the speaker, even in the meeting or the class. There are a plethora of people who contend that we should interrupt and correct the mistake. Others think it is better to be silence when face with this situation. There is also a third reaction which points out that it is a good idea if stay untill the end of the meeting and then talk about what you think is true. I, to a great extent, corroborate the last statement as it seems rational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons in support of my viewpoint more.
To commence with, the most imperative reason comes to mind at first is that we should allocate more respect to the people specifically the one who is in charge of the meeting or classroom. With this in mind, it is better to do not interrupt the mistake just when the speaker is during the talk. For instance, I remember the conference which Profossor Tavakoli, who is the best in marine science, was talked about the specific point of Dunaliella Salina and one of the student in this conference, interrupted his speak and said it is not true. The professor mentioned lots of point in support of his idea and also was so upset about the behavior of the student. Since he expect to get more respect. Therefore, this experiment can taught me the lesson that it is requireto allocate respect when you face with the speaker.
Another equisite point which deserves some words here is that we can be wrong even when we think we are stay in true position. Let me take you back to second year of my master education. We, as the student were in the class and teacher told a new point which was related to the field of my thesis. I recently read about this point in the article and I known the point which was alluded by teacher is false. When I considered to mentioned it, I think maybe he was true since although I read about it, maybe the horizon of my knowledge is limited and I just get one viewpoint with out considering whole the area. After the class, when I told about this point to my teacher, he said that it was not the one point which I should consider. As you can see, it was better choice to be silence after end of the class and then talk about whatever has been questioned.
In sum, taking the aforementioned ideas into consideration, we may draw a conclusion that not only is it more respectful behavior for the speaker when you lets continue to speak, but also it is canceivable which you are wrong. So, it is highly recommended that be more pationt to mention the mistake during the speak of teacher or speaker.
|2019-09-26||birkiy||70||Read full essay|
|2019-01-14||Ilgar||76||Read full essay|
|2018-12-04||shadiiii||66||Read full essay|
|2018-11-10||behzad.nouri||73||Read full essay|
|2018-10-26||Arni||73||Read full essay|
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th66
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'mistakes'?
...s owing to the fact that there are some mistake that sometimes occured by the speaker, ...
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pset about the behavior of the student. Since he expect to get more respect. Therefor...
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'expects'.
...t the behavior of the student. Since he expect to get more respect. Therefore, this ex...
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: WITH_OUT
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
...is limited and I just get one viewpoint with out considering whole the area. After the c...
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'let'
...ctful behavior for the speaker when you lets continue to speak, but also it is cance...
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e pationt to mention the mistake during the speak of teacher or speaker.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, for instance, i think, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 15.1003584229 238% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.0286738351 263% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45275590551 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45331511174 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44094488189 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1049802687 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106049496958 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359264811764 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276395173489 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745024689182 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112914273879 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.