The role of university professors has always been a noteworthy matter when it comes to talking about improvement the quality of education. There are a plethora of people who contend that it is a good idea if universities spend more money on professors' salaries to enhance the quality of education. Others take an opposite point and count the professor's role weak. I, to a great extent, corroborate the second perspective as it seems more rational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons in support of my viewpoint in detail.
To commence with, the most imperative reason comes to mind at first is that they are not the sole parameter that could have effect on improvement of the education. It is conspicuous that there are lots of parameters like the facilities, the management of university, the amount of scholarship, the students' motivation and so forth which may have effect on having better educational system. Considering these parameters, manager should identify the most important parameter and then place a high value on this. This identification needs more research to be done and could not be the same in different universities. As you can see, this whole picture shows that increase in professors' salaries is not necessarily a good idea for having better educational system.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that there are lots of professors who are qualified but they could not have taught the students as good as they know about a special field. Let me take you back to a few years ago when I was a first-year university student. I studied Food Science and Technology in Shahid Beheshti University of medical Scieneces which is one of the most prestiguous university in my country. At first year, when I was at different classes, I had a bad feel about the content since most of the professors say everything uneven, I mean irregular. There is just one of my professor who taught the Food Chemistry and he was the person whom I admired the most since she said every detail and have specific discipline. I knew that in most of the courses, student study by themselves and the professors had minuscule effect on their information. This experience taught me that improve the quality of education is not really related to the increase in the salary of university professors.
To wrap it all up, taking all the aforementioned ideas into consideration, we may draw the conclusion that not only are the professors only one of the parameters could have a specific effect on quality of education but also some of them are not really good to have impressive effect on this, so it is highly recommended that the universities find the most important parameter by research and the they try to improve the education by intensifying that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...rs take an opposite point and count the professors role weak. I, to a great extent, corrob...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...versity, the amount of scholarship, the students motivation and so forth which may have ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...ost important parameter by research and the they try to improve the education by intensi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, then, i mean, talking about, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90212765957 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92997805278 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.081410957 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154466362278 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553269636158 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625119363636 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100718741194 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471588249941 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.