What is the most important option to improve has always been a very noteworthy matter when it comes to talking about the duties of governments. There are a plethora of people who contend that it is more significant to spend the money to improve internet access rather than public transportation. I, to a great extent, repudiate this idea as it seems irrational. In what follows, I will attempt to clarify the reasons in support of my viewpoint in detail.
To commence with, the most imperative reason comes to mind at first is about the accessibility and beneficial use that each of these two options has for people. It is conspicuous that public transportation can use by every person in the society and most of the people need to it, so it is better to improve since this improvement will be more tangible in the societies. It is not surprising to notice that the internet, without considering to use for accessing to social media like Instagram, Facebook and so forth, is not an important matter for all the people during a day. This claim is not just because of my observation between my friends and family and the research in the University of Tehran has been done about it recently. I, as a university student, have more connection to the internet due to my projects and there are lots of students who have the same situation. Owing to this fact, the researchers conclude that it is better to improve the internet in universities instead of total improvement. With this in mind, you can consider how more usable is the public transportation compared to have internet connection.
Another exquisite reason to be mentioned here is that the positive effect of each one in the environment. As we all know, the more the people use the public transportation, the less air pollution exist. Therefore, it is better to devote huge money to improve the public transportations. Let me take your attention to an article that I read in the social magazine last week. The Rooz, as a social magazine, always investigate different problems related to daily life. Last week, they peruse the effect of public transportation on air pollution and how Germany can use benefit by improving its public transportation. The Germany increase the number of high-tech bus, line of the metros and create some new transportation, called Tran and they found the profound effect of these changes on decrease the air pollution. As you can see, improvement of the public transportation is really important.
To wrap it all up, taking all the aforementioned ideas into consideration, we may draw the conclusion that not only is the public transportation more necessary for every persons in the societies but also it could have great benefit for environment, So it is highly recommended that allocate more budget to public transportation in order to make more profits for all people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, as for, talking about, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9194214876 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02373403637 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487603305785 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6354012334 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.05 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229974149598 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713010356158 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658236323982 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143366519534 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265392955877 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.