In view of the reading, the author enumerates the low possibility of sending humans to Mars by considering the possibility of successful missions to the Moon, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents a piece of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that the bereft of food, fresh air, and water for at least 2 years since a round-trip to Mars and back take this time. Also, the author mentioned that it is not conceivable to provide these amount by using a cargo since the capacity is too low. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the astronauts can use a hydroponic technique. In this manner, the plant can grow without the water and if they use it, they can provide Oxygen besides the decrease of the CO2.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that zero-gravity environment can have many obnoxious effect on human body like decrease muscle mass and diminish bone density. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that there are lots of astronauts who had experience such this condition and they protect themselves by using the Calcium against the decrease of the bone density and doing exercise for having strong muscles.
Finally, the author asserts the lack of any specific technique against the harmful radiation as the last point for supporting the low possibility of sending human to the Mars. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by elucidating that the radiation is not dangerous all the time. So, the astronauts can provide the high-tech equipment in order to protect themselves against this occasional radiation. This equipment can be like a small shelter which the astronauts use whenever they face with radiation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
...at there are lots of astronauts who had experience such this condition and they protect th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, conversely, finally, first, if, so, at least, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99667774086 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67661122228 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548172757475 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9353484549 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.