In view of the reading, there are many old fossil structures which are skeptical about their creators and the author enumerates that bees could be their creatures by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents some evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that there is no chance for bees to were the creatures since there is no evidence of their fossil related to 200 million years ago. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although there is no piece of evidence, it could be related to lack of trees to preserve this fossil as they were so scarce.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that it should be many flowers in the area which the fossil bees were there, but there is not. considering the mutually dependent biological relationship of the bees with flowers, we can conclude there were no bees. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this by clarifying the fact that the bees also can live on unflowering plant like pine trees, so it could be conceivable that there were such these plants.
Finally, the author asserts he bereft of caps in the fossil structure as the last point for supporting the idea that they were made by other animals like beetles since the bees usually create the caps on their nests. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing the fact that there is chemical evidence for waterproof characterization which is the same as the material that has been produced by modern bees, so it is possible to consider this structure as a thing which created by the bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
...ssil bees were there, but there is not. considering the mutually dependent biological relat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77385159011 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4927469109 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508833922261 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9492473642 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.111111111 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4444444444 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142643926784 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606754577756 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267515087718 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868807787019 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270368694013 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.