Both the passage and the lecturer discuss the possible solutions to reverse the current tend of increasing salinity in Salton Sea, in order to save the fish and birds living in that place. Accordingly, the passage tries to present three distinct options and support the feasibility of them. In contrast, the lecturer points out that, non of the solutions are practical and they would not work out. The details of the contrast between the passage and lecture is presented in the following section.
First, the article comes up with the idea of removing salt from water in special desalination facilities. These facilities would be able to emit some portion of existing salt in the water and, gradually, decrease the salinity of water. While, the lecture illustrates that, the residual of mentioned procedure, which is solid salt, could be severely hazardous to the environment. As a result, this can not be a great solution.
Second, the article proposes diluting the salt level of lake with ocean water. This solution requires a long distant channel or pipeline to convey the ocean water for about 100 kilometers distance. Although the lecture does not refute the possibility of this solution, it illustrates that, such a channel would be incredibly expensive to build.
Furthermore, the passage claims that, constructing some separator walls inside the lake, can help to channel enough fresh water to the main body of lake and keep it alive in the future. The lecturer denies this claim and points out that, the area is potent to devastating earthquakes, and the walls would collapses by the first earthquake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'collapse'
Suggestion: collapse
...tating earthquakes, and the walls would collapses by the first earthquake.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, second, so, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6810145633 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8238321245 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.230769231 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889780614922 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340899910833 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250887111513 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547982786979 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028023508189 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.