Both the reading and the passage explains about the "great houses" which are in the American south-west in Chaco Canyon and are related to the twelfth century and contain hundreds of thousands of rooms. The author of the passage explains three theories about how the buildings were used. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on all of the theories.
The first theory in the passage states that the houses were purely residential for housing hundreds of thousands of people. On the other hand, the professor challenges this theory and illustrates that these building from outside looks like native American's apartments. But, inside the buildings are not like an apartment because there is not enough fireplace. He also explains that the fireplaces are enough for ten families, not for hundreds of families.
The second theory is that houses were used to store food supplies. The author also explains that one of the main crops that Chaco people used was grain maize. However, the professor challenges this theory and states that the excavation of these building was not suitable for storing grain maize and have not cover for the maize. Additionally, if these were for storing maize, there should have been some evidence of maize on the ground.
The last theory is about using these buildings as ceremonial centers. The professor opposes this assertion and illustrates that there should have been some evidence of ceremonial actions. For instance, there should have been sand, stones or construction tools; however, there is not anything like them. He also explains that pots that are founded in the buildings, were for daily uses, not for a ceremony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...professor in the lecture casts doubt on all of the theories. The first theory in the pass...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'covered'.
Suggestion: covered
...le for storing grain maize and have not cover for the maize. Additionally, if these w...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere for daily uses, not for a ceremony.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15018315018 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51370673935 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472527472527 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2915134201 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.