the reading and lecture both discuss the possible uses of the massive building that found in South America. While the reading provides three explanations of the uses of theses massive building, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that these buildings used as a residential places. This is because they found famous apartment building similar to these buildings. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that these building were similar to native American building from outside, but these are different from inside. In fact, these building should be for hundreds of people to live together. So, they have to find many fire places for cooking. However, they found just few fire places. As a result, these massive building could support just ten families.
Secondly, the reading mentions that these building used as storage for food supply. This is because these building were large enough to support the mazie. However, the professor rejects this point by explaining that there was no evidence to support this idea. In the same time, if these buildings used for storage, they should found traces of mazie on the floor. In addition, they should spile some mazie on the ground. In fact, they could not find anything to support this idea. Moreover, they should find big containers.
Lastly, they might used these buildings as a ceremonial centers because they founds broken pots. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by pointing out that they found many other materials like building materials. For instance, they found stone, sand, and tool. Furthermore, these materials through away. So, these pots could be as a regular trash too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading and lecture both discuss the po...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...t these buildings used as a residential places. This is because they found famous apar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... should spile some mazie on the ground. In fact, they could not find anything to s...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'found'
Suggestion: found
...gs as a ceremonial centers because they founds broken pots. Nevertheless, the professo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: THROUGH_AWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throw'?
Suggestion: throw
... and tool. Furthermore, these materials through away. So, these pots could be as a regu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22661870504 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41372267253 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510791366906 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7335186309 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.1904761905 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2380952381 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.