TPO 50
Based on the set of material, the article discuss three main problems that prevent human going to Mars, on the other hand, the lecture casts doubt that information that is presented in the reading passage and believes that the presented reasons are not convincing enough.
Frist of all, the author contends that enough supplies is a big problem for a long journey for space travel. The space vehicles have limited capacity for these essential supplies. However, the lecturer claims that we could use the hydroponic technology to grow crops in the water to save the space. Plus, the plants will absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen. What's more the plants can be raised in the recycled water, then released water vapor is clean enough to drink for astronauts. Thus, the first point in the passage does not hold the water.
In addition, the reading demonstrates that astronauts will face severe problems due to zero-gravity environment. Yet again the speaker in the lecture opposes this opinion and posits that there are several method to prevent these negative effect due to zero-gravity environment. Like astronauts will do regular exercise and take vitamin C or calcium pills to slow down the bone problems. Therefore, the second points does make any sense.
Despite the statement in the reading passage that it is hard to protect astronauts from space radiation, professor reputes that solar radiation is not in dangerous level all the times, we can bring a special instrument to monitor solar radiation in the space. When dangerous solar radiation comes, astronauts will go into the shatter space to get protection. Hence, the third point in the passage is untenable from professor's explanation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...sorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen. Whats more the plants can be raised in the re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'several methods'.
Suggestion: several methods
... this opinion and posits that there are several method to prevent these negative effect due to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1618705036 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58213505815 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9400237693 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.