TPO 50
The reading passage claims that scientists should take many problems into consideration when it comes to the human mission to Mars and for this mission, some difficulties would be needed to resolve. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author claims that back and forth travel to the Mars is along with trials and tribulations in case of water, oxygen and food supply because the travel will take at least two years. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea that a new technique called Hydroponic can provide an opportunity for Astronauts to cultivate crop plants in the spacecraft and make the best use of collected water and oxygen released by plants.
Furthermore, the author points out that zero-gravity environment in the space will have deleterious effects on the body of humans and create some problems for their muscles and bones. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that vast majorities of Astronauts are adept enough to travel to the Mars because they learn how to cope with the zero-gravity environment through regular practices.
Finally, as set forth by the author astronauts will be subjected to dangerous solar radiation emitted by the sun and building a shield at the present time is impossible. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that radiation emitted by the sun is not dangerous for the whole time. Indeed this solar radiation can affects astronauts occasionally and they can protect themselves through special instruments, which do not add to the weight of the spacecraft.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...un is not dangerous for the whole time. Indeed this solar radiation can affects astron...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...e time. Indeed this solar radiation can affects astronauts occasionally and they can pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, at least, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14015151515 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76818793434 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587121212121 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.78973485 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.777777778 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.