In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that sending humans to Mars is a serious challeng and it is completely impossible. While, in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that trip to Mars will be challeng but the scientist find solution for predicted problems for travel to Mars.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that travel to Mars is a very long trip and supplying food and oxigen for space crafte personel the first challeng. However, the professor claims that the problem of food can be solve by growing plants by hydropanic method. In this method plants grow in this water and need very few space and also, plants can providing the oxigen that need for birth. Forthurmore, the scapce cratfe can recycle wast water and use it again.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that we can not avoid from harmful effect of livining in the zero gravty environment for the long time. She says that the studies shows that humans can avoided from mussel loses by regular maner of excersis and using calcium supplaments.
Finally, in the text it is stated that people in the Mars will be expose to dangerous radiation emitted by the sun. The professor subscribes that this radiation are not present all the time. The space crafte can monitor the sun radiation and they stay in the spaceship until the harmful radiation is present in the unshield environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun space seems to be countable; consider using: 'few spaces'.
Suggestion: few spaces
...plants grow in this water and need very few space and also, plants can providing the oxig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ofessor disagrees with this idea that we can not avoid from harmful effect of liv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80478087649 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45125815228 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517928286853 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1565817891 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.