TPO 50 Q1
The reading states challenges, which human being would confront during missions to sending humans to mars in the near future, and explains three problems the Moon missions did not have to face before; however, the lecturer casts doubt on these issues.
First, the text explains the duration of the go-and-back-trip to mars, that is at least two years, and it is not easy to carry enough supplies of food, water, and oxygen required for passengers for the mentioned period trip by the spacecraft; conversely, the professor argues that by hydroponic methods, that are based on making plants' root in the water and collecting food and oxygen during trip time in spacecraft. Additionally, the waste water of trip would be used in this method and resulted clean water.
Moreover, the passage exerts the zero-gravity on mars for long time, would have negative impacts on the human body such as muscle mass and bone density; although, the lecturer argues that astronomers during long-term space trips utilize additional calcium and vitamins with their food, and do special excercises to reduce these side effects.
Finally, the reading avers that dangerous radiation emitted by the Sun has not been avoided without Earth's magnetic field or a protector spaceshield for the whole spaceship, which is not practical; however, the professor explaines that all level of the radiations are not dangerous. also, she states that by monitoring these radiations not only is not impossible to be avoided the dangerous levels, but also the small shelter for putting in the radiation pathway to reach spacecraft helps to pass the danger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...el of the radiations are not dangerous. also, she states that by monitoring these ra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, moreover, so, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20229007634 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66199142687 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 21.2450331126 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.451342561 49.2860985944 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 227.166666667 110.228320801 206% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.6666666667 21.698381199 201% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06452816374 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.9 13.3589403974 186% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 53.8541721854 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.0289183223 182% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.498013245 183% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.