The main idea if both the reading and the lecture is about the asteroid colonization by human beings. Although the reading mentions three reasons why establishing colonies on asteroids are practical, the lecturer finds them not useful which cause some serious drawbacks.
First of all, the reading mentions that taking off and landing on asteroids would be safe due to the low gravity of asteroids. However, the lecturer explains that landing on asteroids is not as probable as we think and low gravity can contribute serious damages including astronauts' health problems. For example, exposing to low gravity can cause reduction of muscles mass and lower the bone density for a few months of being exposed in lower gravity, let alone that some trips may take longer than usual.
Furthermore, the author states that some asteroids can provide their sponsors or colonists great amount of invaluable metals and raw materials such as gold and platinum. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that this would not be a gainful idea and some other aspects should be considered. Not only should colonists take into account the high costs of equipment and transportation of those materials, but also they have to pay more attention to the fact that these expenditures would decrease the amount of profit and outcome. The more the quantity of those metals are brought back to the earth, the less the price of them will become due to the larger material supplies. Thus, their price in markets would be lowered.
Eventually, the reading claims that since asteroids can be either pass through the Earth periodically or stay close to the Earth, landing on them and getting back from them would be much easier. In contrast, according to the lecturer, while getting into the asteroids would be achievable, getting back from them would not be as possible as their landings. Some of them my either stay in the vicinity of the Earth or travel farther than Mars or Moon which would be so problematic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98498498498 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54916574466 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1889065291 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0830120954267 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377549970712 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039748886295 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625060860139 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446044527387 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.