Tpo 52
Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons
Low Gravity
To begin with, asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity. When landing a spaceship, the craft would not be pulled as strongly or as forcefully toward the asteroid's surface, making the landing safer than landing on the Moon or Mars; it would also allow a spacecraft to carry much more equipment needed to set up the colony. It would also be easier for the spacecraft to take off again, so the spaceship would need to carry considerably less fuel for the trip back to Earth.
Mining Valuable Metals
Next some asteroids are rich in valuable elements and precious metals that are relatively rare on Earth, such as gold and platinum. An asteroid colony would be extremely profitable and a good source of these raw materials. The colonists or businesses sponsoring them could more than pay for the cost of their support by mining minerals and sending them back to Earth.
Easy to Reach
Finally, asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would be very easy to reach. There are a number of asteroids that periodically come within or near Earth's orbit Some of them actually get closer to Earth than our Moon. So these asteroids would be much easier and more affordable to get to and get back from than a planet like Mars, which would require a two-year trip in each direction.
The reading and lecture both about colonization notion of asteroids. The author of the reading feels that in our galaxy thousand of asteroids and easy to colonization there for several reasons. The lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that the presenting claims are not practical and has a serious downside.
To begin with, the author argues that it has less gravity and easy to land of the ground. He also claims that less gravity allows the spacecraft to transfer more instrument and requires less fuel. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer, He mentions that low gravity has a negative impact on the body. He also states that astronomer experienced muscle mask and bone stretch after spending several days on the spacecraft. Moreover, muscle and bones lose their density.
Second, the writer suggests that asteroids are full of valuable metals like gold, platinum which is a profitable source of earning. He also adds that from this business the project can easily sponsor. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that minerals are the profitable business but it is not the whole picture. He claims that the transportation rate is high and when the precious material will available to the market the consumer will be less interested and the market price will low.
Third, the author posits that asteroids come constantly near to the earth and require less time to transfer. He also mentions that it will be affordable and also cost-effective. In contrast, the lecturer position is that it is true that they orbit near to the earth but also pass the earth far distance. He also noted that when it departed the earth for a long time it will be challenging for the spacecraft to reach on earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...of the reading feels that in our galaxy thousand of asteroids and easy to colonization t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...colonization there for several reasons. The lecturer challenged the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, in contrast, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63114456033 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.172760298 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0588235294 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0387710354544 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0152190202588 0.0996497079465 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335402000692 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0304644779262 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042188601387 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.