Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day from Monday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new, Company X claims that the policy would help to increase profits by shutting down offices on Friday and to boost employee morale by reducing commuting time to and from work each week.
Company X claims that switching to a 4-day workweek instead of 5-days will help to increase the company's profit by shutting down the offices on Friday and boost employee morale. Also reducing commuting time to and from work each week. However, the proposal has some flaws and will not be accepted if it fails to answer some critical assumption. Moreover, the conclusion dismisses some assumption which is important to draw an accurate conclusion.
Firstly, the company X proposed that switching to 4-days workweek instead of five days will boost employee morale because will get one day extra for resting. But, 4-days workweek employee will have to work 10 hours per day which means almost 12-hours per day. As a result, the employee will not get enough time to spend with his family which will adversely affect employee and family, not morale. Moreover, 10 hours of work employee will be exhausted, less concentrating and fatigue in work.
The second flaw is, by shutting down the office on Friday will reduce the company's expense associated with it. But, it can be clearly seen that the total hour of office is the same in a week. Moreover, the expense related to the office like electricity expense, snacks expense etc. will be the same. So, this will increase profit for the company will not be realistic and highly flawed.
The third issue is, reducing commuting time to and work each week may be right. But, after work of 10-hours and nearly 2-hours of a path from home to office or office to home, anyone will be tired. As a consequence, the employee will feel lethargy in the office which result is less efficient in work.
While the overall hypothesis was interesting but, by examining various fact to conclude that the proposal required more information to validate the proposal.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 304 350
No. of Characters: 1450 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.176 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.77 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.435 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.924 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.587 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.058 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...es on Friday and boost employee morale. Also reducing commuting time to and from wor...
^^^^
Line 8, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his will increase profit for the company will not be realistic and highly flawed....
^^^
Line 11, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which result is less efficient in work. While the overall hypothesis was interes...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 304.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95394736842 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47836029198 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523026315789 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5213895169 57.8364921388 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5882352941 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.15768463074 174% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291887340172 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098304024472 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125379168334 0.0701772020484 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130517095586 0.128457276422 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113562557496 0.0628817314937 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.