tpo 6
The reading and the lecture are both about encyclopedia, which is about traditional encyclopedias and online encyclopedias. The author of the reading believes that traditional encyclopedia are more valuable than online encyclopedia. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that traditional encyclopedia is not completely perfect as online encyclopedia.
First of all, the author claims that who write the online encyclopedia are not enough deft, so they are not as qualified as who write traditional encyclopedia. This point is challenged by the lecture. She says that traditional encyclopedia are not accurate, and in other hand in online encyclopedia if there are some mistake, always there is a chance to easily correct them, so we must not concern about lacking expert in writing online encyclopedia.
Secondly, the authors states that always there is danger for haking online encyclopedia. He argues if one person modifed the contexts of this encyclopedia, prople can not read accurate text. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. She suggests that there are two way for protecting these encyclopedias from changing by vandal persons. First, we can change the format of writing in a way that hacker can not alter the context. Second, we can use special authors for this purpose.
Finally, the author mentions that the online encyclopedia repeat unimportant topics very much, so people who read them confuse between essential context and other issus. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that if online encyclopedia focus very much in some context, because they do not have limited space and space is not issu for them and they can sa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...more valuable than online encyclopedia. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...h deft, so they are not as qualified as who write traditional encyclopedia. This po...
^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'mistakes'?
Suggestion: mistakes
...n online encyclopedia if there are some mistake, always there is a chance to easily cor...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22 0.261695866417 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.153333333333 0.158904122519 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0933333333333 0.0723426182421 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0733333333333 0.0435111971325 169% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0433333333333 0.0277247811725 156% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143333333333 0.128828473217 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0366666666667 0.0370669169778 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90680342865 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00333333333333 0.0208969081088 16% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0966666666667 0.128158765124 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.02 0.0158828679856 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133333333333 0.0114777025283 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1679.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21851851852 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388888888889 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255555555556 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181481481481 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111111111111 0.113142543107 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90680342865 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503703703704 0.539623497131 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.4493577981 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.7502111507 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6519196497 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.933333333 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.7502111507 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.878197800319 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 43.5555555556 50.5018328374 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.48148148148 1.90840788429 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12481031233 0.142949733639 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103793615555 0.0787303798458 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.544803406474 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17344548991 0.139662658121 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389682962947 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.105566290623 0.0530846634433 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.