TPO 63 integrated
The reading passage and lecture both talk about the spread of cheatgrass and its conversion to the dominant plant. The reading passage mentioned several solutions by ecologists against cheatgrass. However, the lecturer rejects the claim made in the reading, casting doubts on all three solutions presented in the passage.
First, the passage mentions that by encouraging grazers to eat cheatgrass as a meal. when the grazer is released in a field filled with cheatgrass, the cheat grass will be consumed by grazers. Then, remain room for other native species to grow and flourish again. Nevertheless, the lectures put forward the counterarguments that cheatgrass is not a preferred plant for grazers to feed from it. Therefore, grazer not only does not eat cheatgrass but also endanger native species because, firstly, they prefer to eat native grass and
thus destroying all others before cheatgrass.
secondly, the passage asserts that burning cheatgrass is one of the other options, as declared by the passage by controlling the fire of grasslands, which can destroy them because cheatgrass is highly flammable. After that cheatgrass seeds are spread on the field for helping them to grow in the field. The lecture, however, states that cheatgrass each year creates many eggs which buried below the surface. Thus if burned cheatgrass just is destroyed its over-surface plant. In springtime, its seeds grow again and so quickly come back to the area.
The passage finally argues that by presenting fungal parasites next to the cheatgrass that can invade a state by the passage in the place where the cheatgrass is a native plant, fungal species control cheatgrass reproduction, and that makes it possible for native North American plants to better compete against cheatgrass. but also this solution was rejected by the lecturer who argues that cheatgrass, for thousands of years, has been living beside the fungal species hence they are resistant to fungal and just weaker or older cheatgrass can be affected by fungal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ng grazers to eat cheatgrass as a meal. when the grazer is released in a field fille...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly, they prefer to eat native grass and thus destroying all others before cheatg...
^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...oying all others before cheatgrass. secondly, the passage asserts that burning cheat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ny eggs which buried below the surface. Thus if burned cheatgrass just is destroyed ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...s to better compete against cheatgrass. but also this solution was rejected by the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cheatgrass can be affected by fungal.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29012345679 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73472117286 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0827919055 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.266666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538377329824 0.272083759551 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190387051308 0.0996497079465 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104019131303 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304016499745 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105877166143 0.0443174109184 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.