tpo 6
Both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss about the communal online encyclopedias. The reading explains the problems with online encyclopedias, however, the lecturer refutes the author and provides three main reasons to reject them all.
First, the author states that online encyclopedias are inaccurate and cannot be relied on compared with traditional encyclopedias. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this idea, suggesting that all encyclopedias suffer from having errors and faults and it is difficult to find a error free text. Moreover, in the printed version of encyclopedias, the occurred errors would last approximately decades and could not be improved and it would be more misleading.
Second, the author discusses that online encyclopedias are prone to be edited or deleted since users can alter their information. However, the lecturer refuses this notion, citing that the crucial facts published in online versions are in unchangeable format. Also, the number of experts in different contexts have an eye to the published information in online encyclopedias and investigate them accurately.
Third, the author indicates that through the use of online encyclopedias, the users cannot decide whether some topics are considerable or not. Conversely, the lecturer explains that in traditional encyclopedias, there is a limitation of space to explain the proposed topic and a group of judges are forced to decide what information are important to include, whereas, the space for online version is not a restriction. The most important merit of online encyclopedia is having enough space to provide various topics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... and faults and it is difficult to find a error free text. Moreover, in the print...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.572 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08949445703 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5097519322 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.636363636 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.