tpo 6 online encyclopedias
The material discusses the using of online encyclopedias, While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the listening details specific points regarding this topic, namely online encyclopedias have many errors. Next, the online materials could be easily hacked. Finally, communal encyclopedias focus on popular topics.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points one specific contradiction not only online encyclopedias have errors, but the traditional one also, so we could not find any comprehensive without errors, and mistakes could be found on and offline. Furthermore, mistakes online could be fixed; however, errors in the traditional encyclopedias remain for decades. In addition to that, experts could use two strategies to prevent hacking, first they use certain closure so no one could make any change in the online articles; moreover, they have special editors who monitor changes and eliminate them. One final point, the traditional encyclopedias have limited space, so it just states what is important, so it could not reflect the great range of interest that people have; on the other hand, in the online encyclopedias space is not an issue. it has a great variety of academic subjects, which actually reflect the greatest diversity of users, so it is one of its strongest advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 792, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est that people have; on the other hand, in the online encyclopedias space is not...
^^
Line 5, column 845, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ne encyclopedias space is not an issue. it has a great variety of academic subject...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52093023256 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96470676607 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4253631289 49.2860985944 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.888888889 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8888888889 7.06452816374 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239235100284 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121524171051 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665127280941 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176519999247 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841706459005 0.0443174109184 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.