TPO 8 Integrated task

In one hand, the reading passage provides some reasons refuting the accuracy of the Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir. The listening passage, however, posits that the Chevalier’s memoir is reliable source of European history and casts doubt on the article’s theories by providing further explanations.

The reading passage states that The Chevalier distorted or invented many events. They provides three historical evidences. The first evidence is that the Chevalier had borrowed a lot of money from a Swiss merchant which proves that he would not be really rich. The second evidence is that he would not captured the conversations between Voltair, a very well-known writer, and him. Because, He had recorded them many years after the conversations occurred. The third evidence is that the Chevalier had a number of politically well-connected friends in Venice who could have offered the prisoners a bribe rather than escaping from the notorious prison in Venice, Italy.

In the listening passage, the professor rejects the critics’ claims. She states that it is true that the Chevaliers spent a lot of money on parties and gambling. He borrowed sums of money because he had sold his properties and it would have toke few days to receive his money. Therefore he had had to borrow money from a Swiss merchant. For the Voltair’s conversation issue, she posits that the Chevalier wrote the conversation notes after they had occurred at that night. The Chevalier had notes and journals which kept the contexts of conversation, so his memoir were based on accurate records. The last issue is about his escape from a notorious prison in Venice. It is true that the Chevalier had had potent Venetian friends, but the prisoners had hardly accepted bribe. Moreover, the government's reports clearly reflects his escape. The documents clearly had recorded that the prison's ceiling after the Chevalier escape had needed repair which demonstrates his escape method as he claimed.

Votes
Average: 4.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...distorted or invented many events. They provides three historical evidences. The first e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'capture'
Suggestion: capture
...he second evidence is that he would not captured the conversations between Voltair, a ve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ave toke few days to receive his money. Therefore he had had to borrow money from a Swiss...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 698, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...n Venice. It is true that the Chevalier had had potent Venetian friends, but the prison...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 883, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prisons'' or 'prison's'?
Suggestion: prisons'; prison's
...documents clearly had recorded that the prisons ceiling after the Chevalier escape had ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 980, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...air which demonstrates his escape method as he claimed.
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'it is true']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268786127168 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.167630057803 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0722543352601 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0317919075145 0.0435111971325 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0635838150289 0.0277247811725 229% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127167630058 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0462427745665 0.0370669169778 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78111629302 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00578034682081 0.0208969081088 28% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124277456647 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0115606936416 0.0158828679856 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115606936416 0.0114777025283 101% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1975.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 316.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414556962025 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322784810127 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240506329114 0.187439937562 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136075949367 0.113142543107 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78111629302 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.2668357924 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5555555556 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3210787853 49.3711431718 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.722222222 132.220823453 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.878197800319 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 49.8340365682 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.68131868132 1.90840788429 88% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130539294415 0.142949733639 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0960027590142 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.513579814854 0.631733273073 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180103388191 0.139662658121 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.524201036456 0.414875509568 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0808320486383 0.0530846634433 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------

Not in a correct format.

The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.