TPO 8 - Integrated task
Both the article and the lecture discuss the Chevalier the Seingalt's memoir. On one hand, the article argues that the memoir is not a valuable historical source about the European society in the eighteenth century. On the other hand, the professor opposes by stating that the memoir cannot correct in every detail but it's still a reliable source.
First and foremost, the reading states that the Chevalier had to borrow a notable amount of money when he was living in Switzerland, which contradicts the claim of the Chevalier that he was very wealthy. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that borrowing somebody's money doesn't mean the Chevalier was destitute of money. She informs that by the time the Chevalier arrived at Switzerland, he had to wait for days for his money to arrive. As a result, he had no choice but to borrow a Swiss merchant's money.
In addition, the article posits that the memoir could not possibly capture accurately the conversations between the Chevalier and Voltaire, a famous writer. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that the Chevalier wrote down everything that he could remember of the conversations he had with Voltaire as a reference for composing his memoir. This was confirmed by the witnesses living with the Chevalier.
Last but not least, the author of the reading indicates that despite the statement of the Chevalier to have escaped from a notorious prison located in Venice, Italy, his jailers were bribed by the Chevalier's politically powerful friends to free him. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. She argues that there were other prisoners, who had more potent friends than the Chevalier had, but none of them managed to break out of the prison. Moreover, the ceiling of the Chevalier room was documented to have been repaired after he was free. According to the professor, this was clearly the evident of the Chevalier's escape from the prison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ail but its still a reliable source. First and foremost, the reading states t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...y saying that borrowing somebodys money doesnt mean the Chevalier was destitute of mon...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'merchants'' or 'merchant's'?
Suggestion: merchants'; merchant's
... he had no choice but to borrow a Swiss merchants money. In addition, the a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to borrow a Swiss merchants money. In addition, the article posits that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...witnesses living with the Chevalier. Last but not least, the author of the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237430167598 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.159217877095 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0502793296089 0.0723426182421 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418994413408 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0418994413408 0.0277247811725 151% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145251396648 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0418994413408 0.0370669169778 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67639934867 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251396648045 0.0208969081088 120% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.00154638098197 181% => OK
Determiners: 0.162011173184 0.128158765124 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00837988826816 0.0158828679856 53% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00837988826816 0.0114777025283 73% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2004.0 1645.83664459 122% => OK
No of words: 324.0 271.125827815 120% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18518518519 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391975308642 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302469135802 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191358024691 0.187439937562 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.157407407407 0.113142543107 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67639934867 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515432098765 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.2598394857 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7960572084 49.3711431718 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 21.7502111507 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 51.8469135802 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.74712643678 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162182174195 0.142949733639 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0867077910857 0.0787303798458 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.676731884046 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.14571690998 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.460797599776 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.068088536964 0.0530846634433 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.