tpo integrated 13
Both the reading and the lecture talk about selling rare fossil to business companies. The reading states that selling the fossil to business companies has many disadvantages and side effect on scientists and on public. However,the lecture disagrees it claims that advantages of selling the fossil outweigh the disadvantages.
First, the reading states that scientists have less access to the fossil. For example, scientists missed the main cause of the extinction. However the lecture opposes this point. It claims that scientists are the most people who have access to fossil. For example, before any one put value on the fossil, the fossil must fist pass on the hand of the scientists. Further more; scientists make the examination and tests on the fossil.
Second, the reading states that the public have limited exposure to fossil. For example, public become less interesting in seeing fossil because fossil now are in the hand of business companies only and there are no access for the public. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims those publics nowadays have more exposure to the fossil. For example, due to the commercial access more schools and libraries are able to buy more fossil and display them to the public.
Third, the reading states that commercial fossil collector always destroy valuable important evidence. For example, the location were the fossil found has been destroyed. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that some fossil will not be discovered without the help of the commercial collector. For example, it is better to have many fossil discovered, even if we can not have all the discovered scientific evidence than having no or little fossil discovered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading and the lecture talk about selling rare fossil to business companies. The r...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...selling the fossil to business companies has many disadvantages and side effect ...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the fossil to business companies has many disadvantages and side effect on sc...
^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ect on scientists and on public. However,the lecture disagrees it claims that advant...
^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...issed the main cause of the extinction. However the lecture opposes this point. It clai...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es this point. It claims that scientists are the most people who have access to f...
^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st people who have access to fossil. For example, before any one put value on the...
^^
Line 11, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re the fossil found has been destroyed. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that s...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 432, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...covered scientific evidence than having no or little fossil discovered.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61152363338 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474264705882 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0059041921 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7368421053 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536555237037 0.272083759551 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191480116831 0.0996497079465 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952062774029 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365062366066 0.162205337803 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681287935049 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.