TPO INTEGRATED 20
The lecture and the reading both are taking whether to suppress the natural forest fire or not. The reading says that the let it fire policy caused three serious damage to the forests. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the let it fire policy benefit the forests.
First, the reading states that there are a lot of damage to the natural vegetation. For example many plants were backland and devastated. The lecture contradicts this point by saying that the forest benefits from the fire, for example, some new plants find there way to grow, also some seeds need the extreme heat to germinate.
Second, the reading states that the wild life of the animals as well as the food chains are affected by the fire. For example, deer and elk seen fleeing the fire. Also some small animals were not able to escape from the fire. But, the lecture opposes this point. It claims that the fire recovered the population. For example, rabbits and hares begin to inhabit the forest, also there are new predators for them appear in the forest as well.
Third, the reading argues that the fire comprised the value of the park. For example, the forest lose their attraction. Tourists are no longer interested to visit the park. Yet, the lecture refutes this point by saying that the tourists now visiting the park every year. Also the forest damage not only because of the fire but also because of the low rain and the dry period accompanied with the fire. But since 1988 no such evidence of dry season or strong wind happened.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it fire policy benefit the forests. First, the reading states that there are...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s need the extreme heat to germinate. Second, the reading states that the wild...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...le, deer and elk seen fleeing the fire. Also some small animals were not able to esc...
^^^^
Line 8, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from the fire. But, the lecture opposes this point. It claims that the fire reco...
^^
Line 8, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in to inhabit the forest, also there are new predators for them appear in the for...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for them appear in the forest as well. Third, the reading argues that the fire ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visit the park. Yet, the lecture refutes this point by saying that the tourists n...
^^
Line 12, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...rists now visiting the park every year. Also the forest damage not only because of t...
^^^^
Line 12, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because of the fire but also because of the low rain and the dry period accompan...
^^
Line 12, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch evidence of dry season or strong wind happened.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71014492754 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16762375255 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.380591983 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4210526316 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5263157895 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357953024212 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116589670892 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606222376634 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226277740939 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423812024984 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.3589403974 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.