tpo integrated 22
The lecture and the reading both discuss using ethanol fuel as an alternative to gasoline. The reading states that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement for gasoline, and enumerates three reasons of support. However, the lecture disagrees. The professor explains that ethanol fuel is a good replacement for gasoline.
First of all, the reading argues that ethanol will cause increase in the global warming by producing too much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The lecture refutes this point by saying that ethanol will not add to the global warming. According to the professor, ethanol is produce from corn which is plant. Plant will counteract the release of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Growing plant will absorb and remove the extra carbon dioxide produced by ethanol.
In addition, the reading states that using ethanol as a source of fuel will reduce the amount of corn need to feed other animals. The lecture opposes this claim. The professor says that ethanol could be produced by using celluloses, which would be finding in the plant cell walls. Furthermore, cellulose is not eaten by animals. Hence, the corn amount could be increase to feed more animals.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that ethanol will never compete with gasoline in price; gasoline is much cheaper than ethanol. The lecture opposes this point saying that ethanol will compete with gasoline in prices. According to the professor, more people will go to support ethanol; increase in the ethanol production will lead to the drop in the prices of the ethanol. Moreover the professor mentions that a study done, proved that increase in the production of ethanol by three times will makes drop in its prices by forty percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The lecture and the reading both discuss...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a good replacement for gasoline. First of all, the reading argues that et...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bon dioxide produced by ethanol. In addition, the reading states that usi...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increase to feed more animals. Lastly, the reading makes an argument th...
^^^^
Line 12, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... the drop in the prices of the ethanol. Moreover the professor mentions that a study don...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 503, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...oduction of ethanol by three times will makes drop in its prices by forty percent.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, lastly, moreover, so, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13427561837 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46337656494 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427561837456 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9528046186 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7222222222 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494240737712 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174191619903 0.0996497079465 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966849811772 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311988729871 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216430557511 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.