TPO INTEGRATED 22
Both the reading and the lecture are talking about using ethanol as an alternative to gasoline in the united states. The reading states that the replacement of gasoline with ethanol has many problems. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that ethanol is a good alternative to gasoline as a new kind of fuel.
The reading states that using ethanol as fuel will not solve the global warming problem. Using ethanol will increase the carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, thus help to trap heat into the atmosphere. But, the lecture disagrees. It claims that ethanol is made of plant such as corn. Using ethanol will counter the act of global warming, because plant remove carbon dioxide from atmosphere.
The reading states that production of significant amount of ethanol will reduce the amount of plant for uses other fuels. For example, some animals feed on corn. Using corn to produce ethanol , could decrease the amount of animals feed on corn. The lecture disagrees. It claims that ethanol could be produced by using cellulose. Substance not eaten by animals.
Third, the reading states that ethanol will not be able to compete with gasoline in the price. According to the passage ethanol producers are supported by tax subsidies, which is a government support. If the this support is taken from the ethanol producer the price of ethanol will increase. Yet, the lecture disagrees. It claims that the when the production of ethanol increase the price of ethanol will decrease. A study shows that that if the production of ethanol increase buy three times as it is now the price will decrease by 40 %.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to gasoline as a new kind of fuel. The reading states that using ethanol as...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nol is made of plant such as corn. Using ethanol will counter the act of global w...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emove carbon dioxide from atmosphere. The reading states that production of si...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d on corn. Using corn to produce ethanol , could decrease the amount of animals fe...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulose. Substance not eaten by animals. Third, the reading states that ethanol w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bsidies, which is a government support. If the this support is taken from the eth...
^^
Line 13, column 205, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...dies, which is a government support. If the this support is taken from the ethanol prod...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... government support. If the this support is taken from the ethanol producer the p...
^^
Line 13, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se the price of ethanol will decrease. A study shows that that if the production ...
^^
Line 13, column 432, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...f ethanol will decrease. A study shows that that if the production of ethanol increase b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, third, thus, for example, kind of, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97122302158 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50363001766 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442446043165 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4391945159 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.8095238095 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.2380952381 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.587306892029 0.272083759551 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192141851057 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115500350158 0.0662205650399 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385117268672 0.162205337803 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258089766325 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.