TPO INTEGRATED 34
The reading states three theories about the main cause of the sea cows extinction. However, the lecture refutes saying that all the theories mentioned in the reading have some problems.
The first point of dispute is if the overhunting by the Siberian people causes the extinction. The lecture claims that the sea cows were very massive creatures and a couple of them could feed a village of Siberian people for whole month. There was no need for over hunting. On the other hand the reading contradicts this point saying that Siberian people were overhunting the sea cows as they were good sources of food in harsh environment.
Another controversial issue is if the decrease in the kelps' population cause the extinction. The lecturer says that there were no evidences that the kelps' population affected by the ecosystem disturbance. Because the whales were marine animals as well and there were no reports for any decline in there population. But, the reading opposes this point saying that the ecosystem disturbance cause decline in the kelps' population which is the main source of food for the sea cows.
The final point of dispute is if the European fur traders lead to the extinction. The professor contends that the population of the sea cows was already in decline after the arrival of the European fur traders to the island. Some thing else rather than the European cause the extinction. Yet, the reading refutes this point by stating that European fur traders caught the last sea cow in 1768. which means that they were responsible for the extinction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in the reading have some problems. The first point of dispute is if the ove...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld feed a village of Siberian people for whole month. There was no need for over ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sources of food in harsh environment. Another controversial issue is if the de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kelps'' or 'kelp's'?
Suggestion: kelps'; kelp's
...versial issue is if the decrease in the kelps population cause the extinction. The le...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kelps'' or 'kelp's'?
Suggestion: kelps'; kelp's
...s that there were no evidences that the kelps population affected by the ecosystem di...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 415, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kelps'' or 'kelp's'?
Suggestion: kelps'; kelp's
...system disturbance cause decline in the kelps population which is the main source of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...main source of food for the sea cows. The final point of dispute is if the Eur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 230, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Something'?
Suggestion: Something
...the European fur traders to the island. Some thing else rather than the European cause the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...raders caught the last sea cow in 1768. which means that they were responsible for th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53853289467 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446886446886 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9786356359 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444647317449 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157470305743 0.0996497079465 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103595609929 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278340113862 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418803795549 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.