TPO INTEGRATED ELEPHANTS BEHAVIORS 51

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that elephants are so fascinating because they show some surprising behaviors that have not been observed in other animals. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that all surprising beliefs about elephants are as a result of the misunderstanding of their behaviors.

First of all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that old elephants leave herd because they are aware of their death. However, the professor claims that this observation cannot confirm that they are aware of their death. Old elephants have thin teeth, so they were separated from the herd to find smoother vegetation to eat which they are common near water, the misunderstand about elephant grave.

In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that elephants have the ability of painting. She says that elephants learn to keep brush with their trunk and paint just through human training, not by an inherited ability. Elephants have very sensitive ears that trainers use it to train them.

Finally, in the text, it is stated that elephants fair of mice. The professor subscribes that elephants fair of mice is because they are unfamiliar with such this small animal. Nonetheless, elephants in the zoo do not fair of mice because they are known this animal.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...o eat which they are common near water, the misunderstand about elephant grave. In addition, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nonetheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07623318386 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65411761694 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0928269615 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160114684429 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071978210812 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286878919055 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103800625991 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136299734725 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.