TPO INTEGRATED ELEPHANTS BEHAVIORS 51

In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses that some of the elephants' behaviors are so unusual and surprising. While in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that these superstitions about unnatural abilities of elephants are the result of the misunderstanding of their behaviors.

First and all, in the text, it is clearly mentioned that old elephants are aware of their death, because they leave their herd to death alone. However, the professor claims that it is not acceptable evidence to prove that they are aware of their death. Old elephants have thin teeth. So, they leave the herd to find smoother vegetation to eat, and these kinds of vegetation can be found near water.

In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that elephants have artistic ability. She says that they can hold brush paint because they have learned to do it. Elephants have very sensitive ears that human use it to train them. Moreover, they are able to learn to paint some simple lines, nonetheless, they are not aware of the meaning this paint.

Finally, in the text, it is stated that elephants fear of mice. The professor subscribes that only elephants which are not familiar with mice fear from them. Thus, their fear is the consequence of their unfamiliarity. However, elephants in the zoo do not fear of mice.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...als, the reading passage discusses that some of the elephants behaviors are so unusual and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93103448276 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64625686328 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3363844511 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7142857143 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133661914705 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577648950665 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490565827799 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869935106254 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344474550479 0.0443174109184 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.