TPO Q1
The article states that many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explains that employees want to work a four-day week are affect on profit company and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the shortened workweek would increase company profits. The professor refutes this point by stating that the company will spend more money. They will spend more money for add more worker and trainer. These worker will same health benefit for five-day week. The company should provide space and more offices for new worker.
Second, the article claims that it would reduce unemployment rates. However, the professor contends that by saying the worker will be available for author job. The company may be ask worker to finish job for five-day during four-day.
Third, the reading avers that the employees could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families. The lecture opposes this point by saying that the four-day work will affect on employees because some companies want some manager stay for five-day and finish entire work for week
employees want to work a four-day week are affect on profit company
Description: two verbs in one sentence. can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: They will spend more money for add more worker and trainer.
Description: The token for is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to for and add
Sentence: These worker will same health benefit for five-day week.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a determiner/pronoun, post-determiner
Suggestion: Refer to will and same
The company may be ask worker to finish job
The company may ask workers to finish job
because some companies want some manager stay for five-day
because some companies want some managers to stay for five-day
because some companies want some managers staying for five-day
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 200 250
No. of Characters: 988 1200
No. of Different Words: 104 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.761 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.94 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.116 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.284 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.619 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4