TPO - writing integrated task
Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage-four-day workweek.
The lecturer completely refutes the reading passage. It is explained how a four-day workweek is not beneficial neither to the companies nor to the employees. There are the following reasons to support this idea.
Firstly, the lecturer states that a shortened workweek will force the companies to spend more money instead of increase companies’ profit. This is because more space and computers will be necessary in addition to training requirements and medical benefits for new workers, which enhance considerably the companies’ costs. This idea disagrees with the reading passage that states that companies’ profit will increase due to the reduction in work errors.
Secondly, the lecture explains that the unemployment rate will not be diminished because hiring new workers is an additional cost to the companies. Furthermore, the companies will choose employees to work overtime or they will be required to do the same job in less time, which is unpleasant and not generate additional job vacancies. This directly refutes the reading passage which states that the unemployment rate will be reduced by the four-day workweek.
Finally, the lecturer believes that the risks of a four-day workweek will decline the quality of life of employees. What this means is that would be a deleterious effect on workers' stability, chances of workers achieve better positions in their careers or even lose their jobs. These are all disadvantageous consequences for their lives. The article, on the other hand, states that the quality of workers' life will be ameliorated, therefore they will spend more time with their families and will have more leisure time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...s that would be a deleterious effect on workers stability, chances of workers achieve b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38697318008 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94252873563 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524904214559 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6452049832 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128257207025 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585224745672 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594085694317 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967177586884 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445289969707 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.