tpo10
In this set of material, the article and the lecture disagree about which hypothesis explains the reason behind sea otter decline population. The reading passage suggests that the pollution theory is more acceptable one and supports it with three reasons. While, the professor believes that the predation theory has a stronger explanation for that decline. Following how the professor debates each reason of the passage.
First, the reading passage states that pollutions which result from oil companies and industrial chemical sources which found in water samples at that area are life-threatening for those sea mall mammals which increase their infection and cause indirect death. However, the listener claims that idea and believes that since there is no one dead sea animal found offshore is an obvious reason that the predators attack seems the probable suggestion of the predation theory.
Second, the writer states that there decline in other sea animals like sea lions and seals along the coast of Alaskan lines which indicates the pollution is behind the reduction in animals population . Whereas, the professor rebuffs this idea proves that human hunting of those animals such as whale leads to that disturbance in the animal population in general. Furthermore, the professor adds that the reduction of sea lions and seals also occurs because human started to hunt those animals.
Third, the author states that the unequal otter population distribution at Alaskan shores is an active support to the presence of pollution at that water. However, the speaker refutes this suggestion, and he states that because the predators can enter easily open water location of that otter so they would be of course decline dramatically, whereas, the area of shallow waters which are not easily to reach by predators would noticeably increase in that animal's population.
the article and the lecture disagree about which hypothesis explains the reason behind sea otter decline population.
the article and the lecture disagree about the hypothesis which explains the reason behind sea otter's decline in population.
the pollution theory is more acceptable one
the pollution theory is a more acceptable one
the reading passage states that pollutions which result from oil companies and industrial chemical sources which found in water samples at that area are life-threatening for those sea mall mammals which increase their infection and cause indirect death.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
the listener claims that idea and believes that since there is no one dead sea animal found offshore is an obvious reason that the predators attack seems the probable suggestion of the predation theory.
the listener claims and believes that since there is no dead sea animal found offshore, it is an obvious reason that the predators attacks seem the probable suggestion of the predation theory.
the professor rebuffs this idea proves that
the professor rebuffs this idea and proves that
Sentence: However, the listener claims that idea and believes that since there is no one dead sea animal found offshore is an obvious reason that the predators attack seems the probable suggestion of the predation theory.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to predators and attack
Sentence: Second, the writer states that there decline in other sea animals like sea lions and seals along the coast of Alaskan lines which indicates the pollution is behind the reduction in animals population .
Description: An existential there is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to there and decline
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to animals and population
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
Don't write a very long sentence or need to make sure one verb for one subject.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 295 250
No. of Characters: 1545 1200
No. of Different Words: 155 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.144 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.237 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.505 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.28 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.39 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.643 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4