Tpo12
Writing number 26(tpo12,integ)
Time:35
Both the reading and lecture are about a portrait related to Jane Austen who was a famous novelist. There is no any picture from this person except a simple sketch of adult Austen that her sister has made it; however, a portrait has been recently introduced by a member of Austen's family as the face of Austen when she was teenager. The reading provides three reasons for verifying this painting. The lecture casts doubts on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that in 1822, Austen's family allowed Austen's portrait to publish in one of her letters as her exact face; hence, this permission can confirm that girl in the portrait is Austen. This point is challenged by the professor. He believes when this painting was recognized as Austen, this writer had died for 70 years; consequently, her family could not have discerned her face.
Secondly, the article claims that this portrait is similar to aforementioned sketch above. Features like nose, mouth, and total shape of the face look like those features in the full-length portrait, even though the sketch is related to adult age. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. The professor elaborates on this by mentioning that Austen's family was populous with a lot of young girls at the same age with Austen; subsequently this portrait could have belonged to one of them especially Austen's niece who was called Merry.
Finally, the reading passage contends that the style of portrait is analogous Ozias Humphrey's style who lived and was active in Austen's teenager age. On the other hand, the professor refutes this and expresses that the canvas of portrait is associated with William Leg. He started to sell his prominent canvases when Austen was older and in 27 age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ten who was a famous novelist. There is no any picture from this person except a s...
^^
Line 4, column 458, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ubts on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments dubious. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00970873786 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52897247171 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550161812298 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0243747164 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.527233693316 0.272083759551 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165261123321 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143126579418 0.0662205650399 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286861281347 0.162205337803 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151889173902 0.0443174109184 343% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.