TPO12-Integrated Writing
The reading passage stated that the recently appearing professional portrait describes the looking of Jane Austen, based on three points. However, the lecture disagreed with this viewpoint for the following reasons.
In the first place, the author claimed that the painting was permitted to use in a publication of Jane Austen's letters in 1882, which supports the reading passage's standpoint. On the contrary, the speaker held the opposite view and contended that Jane Austen had been dead for seventeen years in 1882 and thus there is no family members who had ever seen her as a teenager.
Additionally, the writer in the reading material believed that the subject of the professional painting looks like that of Cassandra's sketch that proves a portrait of Jane Austen. In the lecture, professor stated that Austen's family was so vast that there were numerous peers of Jane Austen and they were similar in appearance, which means that the painting may depict any one of her peers.
At last, the passage mentioned that the painting may be created by Ozias Humphrey due to the style and Ozias Humphrey's creative period overlapped with the period when Jane Austen was at the age of the girl in the painting. On the other hand, the listening passage claimed that Ozias Humphrey wasn't in London when Jane Austen was at the age and the canvas wasn't sold in London until Jane Austen was 27 years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ing passage claimed that Ozias Humphrey wasnt in London when Jane Austen was at the a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 356, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ne Austen was at the age and the canvas wasnt sold in London until Jane Austen was 27...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, may, so, thus, on the contrary, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92827004219 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4593329314 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4782632473 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497479191161 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218379493301 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832032500015 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293853992669 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771597929286 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.